Pyongyang’s threat to America with-or without-neuclear weapons
Comments by W. Hall on Dimitris Konstantakopoulos’ “The Danger of Nuclear War”
The danger of Nuclear War and the Political Paralysis of Europe, the European Left, Russia and China, by Dimitris Konstantakopoulos
The meaning of the Columbus Day article by Charles Hurt at the Breitbart website does not appear to be that Mr. Hurt is urging President Trump to launch a nuclear attack on North Korea. He is contrasting the patriotic pride of the Americans who would see the coming of Columbus (and of Europeans) to the United States as the beginning of a glorious historical epoch to the allegedly self-abasing stance of the “dreamless street organizer” (Obama) who interprets the same events as a deplorable foreign invasion, and yet encourages similar (deplorable?) invasions of America by foreigners in the present day. In other words Mr. Hurt is engaging in Republican versus Democrat party politics, pointing to contradictions in the stance of his domestic party opponents. On the domestic subject of immigration.
For what it is worth, Steve Bannon, who “controls” the Breitbart website, is on record as saying, in relation to the prospect of an American attack on North Korea: “There’s no military solution [to North Korea’s nuclear threats], forget it. Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”
So Bannon does not even think that North Korea needs nuclear weapons. They can, according to him, deter with their conventional weapons any threat of an American attack. Which means that their obsession with defending their “right” to nuclear weapons is simply a matter of prestige, not of military need. As is true of France, certainly, and possibly all the other nuclear weapons states.
Read the Aritcle
The Nuclear Option: Why Columbus Deserves His Day
by CHARLES HURT 9 Oct 2017
In this era of Making America Great Again, it is true and wonderful to celebrate this great and glorious holiday and sing high praises for the good and daring adventurer who discovered America.
In fourteen-hundred ninety-two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.
He sailed through sunshine, wind and rain. He sailed by night; he sailed by day; he used the stars to find his way.
One person who appreciates Spain’s great explorer is President Donald Trump.
“Five hundred and twenty-five years ago, Christopher Columbus completed an ambitious and daring voyage across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas,” said Mr. Trump, sounding like a man who appreciates risk and accomplishment. Kind of like building great skyscrapers in great cities of the world.
“The voyage was a remarkable and then-unparallelled feat that helped launch the age of exploration and discovery,” Mr. Trump proclaimed from the White House. “The permanent arrival of Europeans to the Americas was the transformative event that undeniably and fundamentally changed the course of human history and set the stage for the development of our great nation.”
This, of course, would ultimately spark the greatest revolution in human history.
Imagine just how radical was the notion that man’s rights derive from God and not a king or government. This fierce and bloody demand for self-governance would give birth to the greatest country on earth and became the blueprint for ending the savage global institution of slavery.
Mr. Trump also honors Columbus as a “skilled navigator and man of faith.” He thanked both Spain and Italy for their contributions to discovering America.
As thrilling as it is to dance back and forth across the lines of Mr. Trump’s simple Columbus Day proclamation, this is also a time of sober reflection over the past eight years with a president who viewed Columbus in a drastically different light.
Americans must, President Barack Obama lectured a year ago, “acknowledge the pain and suffering reflected in the stories of Native Americans who had long resided on this land prior to the arrival of European newcomers.”
Just as Mr. Trump’s statement sounds like that of a master builder who creates what he dreams, Mr. Obama’s statement sounds like a dreamless street organizer hell bent on whipping up discontent and sewing racial discord.
Anyway, isn’t it incredibly xenophobic and — according to Democrats — outright racist to say that Native Americans should be protected from outside invaders just because they had “long resided on this land prior to the arrival” of others?
In other words, it’s just fine for Mr. Obama to refer to Columbus as an illegal alien. But it is completely racist for Mr. Trump to talk about illegal aliens who come into our country and rape or murder our citizens.
“America First” is racist. But “Native America First” is totally fine.
And you wonder why the barbarians in Iran, theocratic thugs in Syria and crazy little Rocket Man in North Korea have been laughing contemptuously at us for the past eight years as they plotted the annihilation of civilized people?
The only statue that should be torn down today is the one in the fictitious town of Springfield on “The Simpsons.”
It is a statue of former failed President Jimmy Carter. When it was unveiled, the townspeople shrieked and declared the preachy huckster “History’s Monster!”
In Springfield, the statue of Jimmy Carter should be torn down and replaced with a statue of Barack Obama, “History’s True Monster.”
• Charles Hurt can be reached at churt@washingtontimes.com; follow him on Twitter via @charleshurt.
